Posts Tagged ‘COP15’

Meet Rainforest Partnership

December 17th, 2009

(COPENHAGEN) The EnviroMedia team is meeting tomorrow for breakfast other Austin folks here attending COP 15. There is a great Austin nonprofit called Rainforest Partnership networking here that you should know about. So I asked Niyanta Spelman, their executive director, to write a blog entry about her experience in Copenhagen.

Maurine Winkley and Niyanta Spelman with Copenhagen Mayor Klaus Bondam

Maurine Winkley and Niyanta Spelman with Copenhagen Mayor Klaus Bondam

There is so much going on here in Copenhagen. It is exciting to hear all the different things people are doing and being creative in the most amazing ways. Yesterday someone mentioned that when she was at COP 1 in Berlin in 1995, she was one of about 150 representing NGOs.  Here at COP 15, there may be 20,000 NGO personnel from all over the world.  To be one of those, it is difficult not to be inspired by the passion and commitment of so many.  One can not be part of this kind of a gathering from all over the world and ignore the magnitude of the problem and the urgency people feel.

In the US we still don’t quite think seriously enough of climate change.  But being here sitting besides people from all around the planet, we cannot ignore our role in the past contributing to global climate emissions, nor our responsibility on this world stage to do something real.  Even if China overtook us in global carbon emissions last year as the largest emitter of these emissions, our per capita emissions are 4-5 times that of the Chinese.  How can we justify not taking responsibility and the lead on this matter at this crucial time?  Will we, the most innovative nation of optimists and entrepreneurs (and I think of myself as a social entrepreneur), lead in finding the solutions necessary to limit global emissions to do any more harm?

There is so much going on here beyond what the mainstream media is covering.  It feels like everyone is here participating in some way, and there is much hope in this city now referred to as Hopenhagen. There is also despair as various proposals are being considered by the UNFCCC and being laid by the wayside.  There are such complex issues and choices that lie before us.

For us at Rainforest Partnership, it is very exciting.  There are so many partnerships we are able to forge here, meet with so many people and conduct business in a very concentrated, productive way.  We are an Austin, Texas based nonprofit organization that works with rainforest communities in Latin America by supporting alternative and sustainable ways of making an income that allows our partner communities to keep their forests standing.

But it is the other part of what we do that is a challenge.  Deforestation plays a very big role in climate change.  About a fifth of all carbon emissions come from deforestation and degradation of tropical forests (cutting and burning of trees).  How do we get folks in the US to think about what we consume and how we consume it that affects the choices people are making in the countries where the deforestation is occurring?

At the U.S. presidential level, we seem to be understanding what is at stake and what needs to be done.  Listening to Steven Chu, our Secretary of Energy, the other day talk about what the US will do to meet this challenge and the President’s commitment, I was encouraged.  But what struck me the most was how he ended his talk.  We need to fix this problem of climate change because there is only one earth, we have nowhere else to go.

I talked to a young Nigerian youth delegate who was so depressed that she stayed away all day, one day this week and then I talked to her and she promised to continue participating.  Will she and the many North American youth delegates (I have tried to recruit some as interns for Rainforest Partnership!) be inspired when COP 15 is over? Or, are they going to leave here thinking that their future remains so bleak because our political leaders could not act in the face of this biggest challenge the planet has ever faced.

Niyanta Spelman is Executive Director of Austin-based Rainforest Partnership.

Learn more about REDD and deforestation in our climate decoder.

Big Auto & Big Electricity Back Copenhagen; But Big Oil?

December 17th, 2009

As 110 world leaders arrive in Copenhagen today and tomorrow, I noticed a few ads in international newspapers at our hotel. The ads show support from major industry that will no doubt feel the effect of any agreement signed here. Big auto and big electricity are publicly supportive, but no big oil that I can find.

Big Auto: “We in the auto industry support the Copenhagen conference paving the way for a comprehensive, global framework for sustainability in the world market.”

According to Sustainable Mobility, members of the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (www.ACEA.be) are BMW Group, DAF Trucks, Daimler, FIAT Group, Ford of Europe, General Motors Europe, Jaguar Land Rover, MAN Nutzfahrzeuge, Porsche, PSA Peugeot Citroën, Renault, Scania, Toyota Motor Europe, Volkswagen and Volvo.

Members of the United States Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers are BMW Group, Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Company, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz USA, Mitsubishi Motors, Porsche, Toyota and Volkswagen Group of America.

Members of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association are Honda, Isuzu, Mazda, Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan, Suzuki and Toyota.

From their Website: What do you want to see in any UN climate agreement?  Answer: The auto industry supports an ambitious yet attainable outcome. Sound long-term targets provide long-range clarity and direction for manufacturers. This is critical in the auto industry, where developing and deploying power trains can take 5-10 years and more. We also welcome the acknowledgement that consumers play an important role in achieving results, as do energy providers and government infrastructure policies. And we encourage the UN to support economy-wide approaches that engage everyone in some way.

The group agrees there should be GHG emission reduction targets, but only says that 50 percent seems like a stretch.

Big Electricity: Created in the wake of the 1992 Rio Summit, the e8 is a non-profit international organization, composed of 10 leading electricity companies from the G8 countries. From the US, both Duke Energy and American Electric Power are members.

From their quarter-page ad in today’s International Herald-Tribune: “The Electricity Sector Affirms its Key Role in Resolving Climate Change.” The e8 “calls on heads of governments and international institutions in Copenhagen to negotiate an international agreement on climate change that will deliver clear, long-term, ambitious, realistic and internationally enforceable targets, including clear interim milestones.” They also support government funding for research and development of Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS), addressing deforestation and energy efficiency.

Even the Big Coal folks behind the “celebrate clean coal” TV ads in the U.S. appear to be moving a bit:

A Dec. 11 statement by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity “supports the adoption of a federal mandatory program that reduces greenhouse gas emissions, ensures continued access to affordable, reliable electricity for American businesses and working families, and promote s greater energy independence through the use of coal and other domestic energy resources. ACCCE looks forward to working with Senators Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman and others in pursuit of legislation that will achieve these goals.”

How About Big Oil?

Exxon-Mobil’s American lobbyist is a regular at COPs, but in Copenhagen his influence is visibly reduced. In Bali, we were in the room when he was the most talkative of the ten business/industry reps were briefed by the Bush Administration. In Copenhagen, there are no less than 90 business reps present for the same meetings from the U.S. State Department.

A quick search of the newspapers being read by world leaders arriving in Copenhagen revealed no similar industry ads like the ones above. Shell Oil bought a half-page ad with the headline, “For The New Energy Future We Need To Make It All Add Up.” Missing were any supportive statements to world leaders here.

A statement by the American Petroleum Institute seems to contradict itself by saying regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act “poses a threat to every American family and business.” Yet four sentences later, acknowledges, “A fit-for-purpose climate law is a much preferred solution.”

Shell, BP America and ConocoPhillips are all members of the US Climate Action Partnership, which favors cap and trade legislation.

“China Can Do More as Citizen of the World”

December 16th, 2009

With negotiations reportedly centered around what both the US and China will commit to, I went to the Bella Center this morning with high hopes of interviewing someone from China. I wondered what non-governmental representatives think.

With protesters causing a riot nearby, the light rail stop at the Center was closed down. Transit cops told me it was a short five-minute walk from the next stop. And it was snowing lightly. Somewhere inbetween, the UNFCCC decided to close off the building to any more non-governmental delegates or business representatives. Despite this disappointment, Chientai Chen, a Taiwan businessman was stuck at the entrance, too. Taiwan is an island governed by the Republic of China.

He shares a short story of a terrible Typhoon that hit his country in April of this year, and discusses views of Chinese awareness of global warming, and his personal opinion of climate negotiations between our two countries.

Thank you, Mr. Chientai for sharing your thoughts.

Meet Island of Rodrigues; Aid Would Mitigate Rising Tides

December 15th, 2009


In the fight for more climate aid for developing countries, many advocates discuss the plight of Tuvalu and the Maldives. But do you know of Rodrigues Island?

From COP 15 in Copenhagen, we interview Hon. Nicolas Von-Malley, a Member of Parliament with the Republic of Mauritius, Rodrigues Island. This tiny, beautiful island off the eastern coast of Africa is already facing rising seas from climate change, damaging farms and endangered bird habitat. Climate aid would help relocate farmers and develop new habitat for an endangered bird species.

Learn more about climate mitigation, adaptation in the Green Detectives climate decoder.

Exclusive: Why Africa Wants Kyoto to Continue

December 14th, 2009

Picture 5

Watch this Green Detectives Exclusive from COP 15: Obed Bapela, member of Parliament of the Republic of South Africa explained to me why the G77 walked out of climate negotiations today to protest wealthy countries avoiding the emissions reduction targets that came with the Kyoto Protocol.
As we’ve written before, climate negotiations are like a high stakes poker game. We predict the U.S. won’t budge when it comes to Kyoto, and that compromise will be met this week with wealthy nations ponying up billions to developing nations for climate finance, including technology transfer and adaptation. Back to climate poker, walk out, ante up. Who is calling whose bluff?

Learn more about climate finance in the climate decoder.


Looking for Winners at Copenhagen Climate Protest

December 12th, 2009

13343_1288197213080_1474693799_792231_7304891_n

IMG_0578

121209protest

Untitled 0 00 03-13

(COPENHAGEN) Throughout the day, the temperature dropped just as the number of estimated protesters increased.

What does it all mean? The latest reports from the Associated Press estimate 600 people were arrested today at a climate change rally of more than 40,000 persons in Copenhagen, Denmark. Organizers say it was closer to 100,000 people who participated.

We know this: despite temperatures below 32 degrees Fahrenheit, we saw thousands of people from all parts of the world on the streets of Copenhagen today, carrying signs and shouting slogans in support of an international agreement on climate change.

Whether it’s a political rally for gun rights or gay rights, the American public tends to give credit to causes which demonstrate the passion of large numbers who actually show up. Getting arrested is extra credit.

After three years of witnessing climate protests and related media coverage at United Nations events in Asia and Europe, we can say without a doubt that interest and concern about global warming is much higher than in our home country.

Do protest stats and news coverage automatically translate into the best policy? It shouldn’t, but often it does, because consumers don’t have time to learn the details of the policy debate.

Learn more about the background issues being debated in Copenhagen and Washington, DC through the Green Detectives climate change decoder.

Photos by Valerie Davis and Kevin Jung. To see more photos, visit our Facebook page.

Corporate Climate Advocating in Downtown Copenhagen

December 10th, 2009

Panasonic sponsored this melting ice skeleton of a polar bear at the WWF Artic Plaza in Copenhagen.

Panasonic sponsored this melting ice skeleton of a polar bear at the WWF Arctic Plaza in Copenhagen.




HP was major sponsor of WWF Climate Savers Business event. These folks learning about energy efficiency through computer power management. Climate Savers Computing Initaitive is here spreading the "Power Down for the Planet" campaign.

HP was major sponsor of WWF Climate Savers Business event. These folks learning about energy efficiency through computer power management. Climate Savers Computing Initaitive is here spreading the "Power Down for the Planet" campaign.




Coca-Cola also sponsored WWF event and this huge Hopenhagen banner near shopping mall.

Coca-Cola also sponsored WWF event and this huge Hopenhagen banner near shopping mall.




Hopenhagen village includes a giant video globe with live text messages for COP 15 coming in from across the world.

Hopenhagen village includes a giant video globe with live text messages for COP 15 coming in from across the world.Siemens sponsoring a giant Christmas tree with lights powered by kids on bikes.



Obama’s Peace Prize Impacts COP 15 visit next week

December 10th, 2009
Obama Accepts Nobel Peace Prize

Obama Accepts Nobel Peace Prize

Despite the doubt by Americans that President Obama is worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize (and Obama’s own statement of same), the prestigious award is certain to boost his Administration’s efforts to implement a new global treaty to address climate change.

I watched the Oslo award ceremony live in my hotel lobby, in Copenhagen, along with a crowd of international guests. The hotel manager jokingly hopes Mr. Obama will come by her hotel next week to try their famous breakfast. He, along with heads of state from 130 countries will attend the final day of the UNFCCC COP 15 negotiations next week. This has never happened in the fifteen years of this meeting.

Just two years ago at this conference in Bali, Indonesia, this body’s own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and former US vice president Al Gore received the same peace prize, and then flew to the conference.

In presenting the the award, the Nobel committee chairman repeatedly mentioned Mr. Obama’s willingness to work with the world community to address global warming. It would be natural for other world leaders to look to Obama for leadership next Friday, and beyond. Yesterday, a US negotiator joked “nobody knows what all the leaders will do that day, but everyone hopes they aren’t actually negotiating the final words for a legal document.”

After watching the lengthy ceremony on TV, I turned and asked a stranger what he thought. Turns out he is also here for COP 15. He’s a semi-retired mechanical engineer from Egypt. He thought it was “good” that Obama received the prize based on commitments to future work. I asked him what Egyptians believed about climate change. He said there was high levels of concern, but awareness of solutions was also also low in his country, and that he personally believed the solutions being proposed here did not go far enough.